Hawaii
Medical Service Association (HMSA) -
HealthPass
(2002)
Critique
The following are verbatim remarks made by the reviewers:
• ROI + at 2 years
• Large scale
• Institutional commitment
• HRA, risk reduction, professional referral
• Participation high, percent participation not as impressive
• Reduction in amount of claims per person impressive
• High satisfaction
• Comprehensive set of program offering, making the program available
to all members
• Providing follow-up from a nurse and then a physician for participants
with health risks identified by the screening,
• Receiving coverage in the plan magazine and high member satisfaction.
• This disease prevention/health promotion program, while in the
broadest sense addresses the entire continuum of care, does place special
emphasis on chronic, high-risk individuals. Annual participation is about
8%, which suggests that they are able to engage a reasonable population
of those at risk. A strength of this program seems to be the personal
contact that is established for purposes of reviewing results and conducting
follow-up. Both nurses and health educators work with the participants
to direct them to appropriate screenings and community programs.
• The program is fully funded by the health plan and is supported
by management through positive endorsement in the annual report and the
health plan magazine.
• Participants reported high satisfaction (99%+) and did realize
risk reduction with more is the low risk group and fewer in the high-risk
group after intervention.
• Medical claims were examined for ’97 – ’00 and
participants were compared to non-participants. Participants had lower
claims/yr. Of $200 and in examining LOS participants had shorter stays
by 2 days. A believable ROI of 1:1 is reported.
• Personalized interventions and individualized counseling
• Assistance to locate PCP
• Conservative approach to determine ROI
• Well written application and program. It is good to see a health
plan with a proactive approach to health management of its members. More
health plans should be made aware of this program example. Figure 5 provided
a good illustration of cost savings. The early detection and referral
portion of the program is excellent.
• Comparison of ppts. vs. non-ppts. medical claims, hospital stays,
and associated costs.
• Use of repeat HRA data to demonstrate changes in health risks
over time
• Meets Healthy People 2010 objectives.
• Program available to all POS and PPO members.
• Excellent design of the program
• Strong commitment by the plan’s senior management to the
program
• Many of the proposed analytic methods make sense – although
it is not clear as to how the analyses were actually carried out
|